List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to PAQ

Article

Volume 30 • Number 1

January 2016



 

 

Geoengineering and Non-Ideal Theory


by David Morrow and Toby Svoboda


Some acts are beyond the pale: they ought never to be done, except perhaps in the most dire emergencies. Other acts are wrong in a less stringent sense: they would never be done in an ideal world, but might be permissible in nonideal circumstances. Deliberate, large-scale modifications of earth systems to counteract or reduce the effects of climate change, known as geoengineering or climate engineering, arguably belong to one of these two types—but which one? Philosophers have argued that geoengineering faces diverse ethical challenges. Yet, advocates of geoengineering research insist that geoengineering might someday be "necessary." One way to construe the research advocates' argument is as a warning that we might need geoengineering to cope with a climate emergency so momentous that ordinary moral constraints do not apply; even if geoengineering truly is "beyond the pale," this argument goes, we may need it to prevent the heavens from falling, as it were. A second way to construe the argument is as an implicit appeal to what political philosophers call "non-ideal theory," which is that part of the theory of justice that tells us what we ought to do in non-ideal circumstances. On this version of the argument, less-than-dire circumstances might permit or even require society to deploy geoengineering, even if no one would deploy it in an ideal world. These two arguments have very different implications for the ethics of geoengineering and geoengineering research.


view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2016 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in Public Affairs Quarterly is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the Public Affairs Quarterly database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.

ISSN: 2152-0542