List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to PAQ

Article

Volume 27 • Number 4

October 2013



 

 

Defensive Interrogational Torture and Epistemic Limitations


by Bradley J. Strawser


The philosophical debate over the ethics of torture has taken on new vigor of late with the publication of several books on the topic by a handful of accomplished moral philosophers. In this essay, I will discuss some epistemic issues surrounding the decision to torture and how those complexities should inform the debate over its moral permissibility in practice. To that end, I will focus on Frances Kamm's Ethics for Enemies: Terror, Torture, and War; Fritz Allhoff's Terrorism, Ticking Time-Bombs, and Torture; Uwe Steinhoff's On the Ethics of Torture; and Stephen Kershnar's For Torture: A Rights-Based Defense. All of these authors defend that torture can sometimes be justified, at least in principle. Most of them go on to explicitly defend that torture can also be permissible in practice in some actual, real-world cases.


view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2013 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in Public Affairs Quarterly is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the Public Affairs Quarterly database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.

ISSN: 2152-0542