List journal issues    
 
 
Home List journal issues Table of contents Subscribe to PAQ

Article

Volume 26 • Number 2

April 2012



 

 

Between Berserksgang and the Autonomous Weapons Systems


by Anton Petrenko

[T]hey howled as wild animals, bit the edge of their shields, and cut down
everything they met, without discriminating between friend or foe.
                    —Frederik Christian Schübeler, Viridarium Norvegicum

Over the last ten years, the use of artificial intelligence in military technologies has become widespread, and the application of autonomous weapons systems (AWS) in warfare has become firmly entrenched. Although currently deployed AWS are built to require human control and supervision, robotic systems capable of making decisions about lethal deployment of force are imminent. The prospect of employing such systems gives rise to a number of moral criticisms—from the conflict proliferation arguments, to arguments from precaution, the lack of moral accountability, and inadequate target discrimination. After briefly reviewing the state of experimental research in military artificial intelligence, this paper will address the moral criticisms of fully autonomous weapons systems. It will be argued that given certain advances, the use of AWS is not only morally permissible but obligatory.


view PDF
 

 

 

 
Home | Issue Index
 
© 2012 by the Board of Trustees of the University of Illinois
Content in Public Affairs Quarterly is intended for personal, noncommercial use only. You may not reproduce, publish, distribute, transmit, participate in the transfer or sale of, modify, create derivative works from, display, or in any way exploit the Public Affairs Quarterly database in whole or in part without the written permission of the copyright holder.

Public Affairs Quarterly is published by the University of Illinois Press on behalf of North American Philosophical Publications.


ISSN: 2152-0542